"A Polyphonic Mosaic”: Exploring the Voices of Childhood in the Transition from Early Childhood Education to Primary Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.64-Iss.1-Art.1640Keywords:
Participatory Research Student Participation Children's Rights Primary Education Educational InclusionAbstract
The transition to primary education demands approaches that recognize children as active participants in constructing their educational experiences, ensuring their right to participation and acknowledging their voices. While Chile's Decree No. 373 marks progress in fostering a coordinated, contextually grounded transition, tensions remain due to over-schooling and rigid curricular standards that limit pedagogical approaches centered on play and active exploration. To address these challenges, various perspectives highlight the need for sensitive, inclusive pedagogical practices that recognize children as political agents and knowledge producers, promoting democratic educational spaces (Boylan et al., 2024; Figueroa-Céspedes & Yáñez-Urbina, 2020; Milstein & Guerrero, 2021).
In this context, the Mosaic Approach (Clark & Moss, 2005; 2017) stands out as a participatory methodology that amplifies children’s voices through play, visual language, and storytelling, shifting pedagogical practices towards more inclusive and democratic models (Delgado-Fuentes, 2020; Sevón et al., 2023). However, its adaptation in Latin America faces methodological and structural barriers, requiring culturally situated research to authentically represent children’s experiences (Jadue-Roa et al., 2018; Milstein & Guerrero, 2021).
This study investigates the implementation of the Mosaic Approach in a first-grade classroom at a subsidized private school in Santiago, Chile, focusing on its potential to understand the educational transition from the children’s perspectives and foster more equitable school environments. The research involved 21 students and four education professionals, utilizing a range of data collection methods, including interviews, group sessions, participant observation, school walks, literary mediation, and photography. Reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2021) was applied to identify patterns and reconstruct the co-research experience, while adhering to ethical principles such as informed consent, confidentiality, and respectful child participation (Jadue-Roa, 2017).
The study identified three key stages: (1) familiarization of the research team with the children and school, (2) methodological implementation, and (3) triangulation of voices and methods. Findings suggest that the Mosaic Approach enhances understanding of children's emotional and social experiences, fostering their agency and addressing social justice issues. Tools like storytelling, school walks, and photography provided a comprehensive view of children’s subjectivity in the transition process. Moreover, the study emphasized the need for authentic listening spaces and active participation, allowing children to express emotions and reflect on their educational experiences.
The research highlights the importance of placing children at the center of the educational process, challenging adult-centric models. It also underscores the need to strengthen dialogue among teachers, school leaders, and students for a more cohesive educational transition. As a limitation of the study, the absence of leadership during the final phase hindered the inclusion of students' voices in the school agenda, highlighting the urgent need to recognize children as legitimate agents of knowledge and to consider their proposals and concerns within the school's agenda. The Polyphonic Mosaic concept illustrates the coexistence of multiple voices in educational knowledge construction, where dialogue serves as the "grout" that unites perspectives and deepens understanding of school transitions. This metaphor underscores the need to integrate children’s experiences into educational research and policy, promoting more participatory, inclusive frameworks.
References
Bajtín, M. M. (1982). Estética de la creación verbal. Siglo XXI Editores.
Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2016). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools (4th ed.). Index for Inclusion Network Limited.
Boylan, F., Barblett, L., Lavina, L., & Ruscoe, A. (2024). Transforming transitions to primary school: Using children’s funds of knowledge and identity. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 32(4), 704-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2023.2291354
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: a practical guide. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2
Cagliari, P., Castagnetti, M., Giudici, C., Rinaldi, C., Vecchi, V., & Moss, P. (2018). Loris Malaguzzi y las escuelas de Reggio Emilia. Morata.
Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2005). Spaces to play: More listening to young children using the Mosaic approach. National Children's Bureau. https://archive.org/details/spacestoplaymore0000clar
Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2017). Listening to young children: A guide to understanding and using the mosaic approach. Jessica Kingsley. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781805014362
Cronin, L. P., Kervin, L., & Mantei, J. (2022). Transition to school: Children’s perspectives of the literacy experiences on offer as they move from pre-school to the first year of formal schooling. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 45(1), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-022-00008-0
Cutuli, R. D. (2020). Recursos literarios para la educación emocional. El monstruo de los colores como “tecnología del yo” para la primera infancia. Catalejos. Revista sobre lectura, formación de lectores y literatura para niños, 10(5), 158-180. https://fh.mdp.edu.ar/revistas/index.php/catalejos/article/view/4058/4285
Delgado-Fuentes, M. A. (2020). El Enfoque Mosaico, derecho a la participación y la voz de los niños en investigación educativa. Revista Electrónica en Educación y Pedagogía, 4(6), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.15658/rev.electron.educ.pedagog20.05040608
Dietz, G. (2019). Diálogos intersaberes: reflexiones metodológicas. En S. Sartorello (Ed.), Diálogo y conflicto interepistémicos para la construcción de una casa común (pp. 95-132). Universidad Iberoamericana.
Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2016). Supporting children's transition to school age care. Australian Educational Researcher, 43(3), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-016-0202-y
Fielding, M. (2004). Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities. British Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 295-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000195236
Figueroa-Céspedes, I., & Yáñez-Urbina, C. (2020). Voces y culturas estudiantiles en la escuela: una reflexión teórico-metodológica desde procesos de autoexploración de barreras a la inclusión educativa. Revista latinoamericana de educación inclusiva, 14(1), 109-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-73782020000100109
Haraway, D. J. (1995). Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres: La reinvención de la naturaleza. Cátedra.
Jadue-Roa, D. (2017). Ethical issues in listening to young children in visual participatory research. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(3), 332-345. http://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1260829
Jadue-Roa, D., Whitebread, D., & Gareca, B. (2018). Methodological issues in representing children’s perspectives in transition research. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 26(5), 760-779. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2018.1522764
Llenas, A. (2018). El monstruo de colores va al cole. Editorial Flamboyant.
Lundy, L. (2007). ‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927-942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033
Malaguzzi, L. (2011). La educación infantil en Reggio Emilia. Editorial Octaedro.
Mercieca, D., & Mercieca, D. P. (2014). Eps becoming ignorant: Questioning the assumption of listening and empowerment in young children. Educational & Child Psychology, 31(1), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2014.31.1.22
Milstein, D. J., & Guerrero, A. L. (2021). Lecturas de etnografías colaborativas con niñas, niños y jóvenes en contextos educativos latinoamericanos. Magis. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 14, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m14.lecn
Ministerio de Educación. (2017). Decreto 373 Exento. Principios y definiciones técnicas para la elaboración de una estrategia de transición educativa para los niveles de educación parvularia y primer año de educación básica. https://www.leychile.cl/Navegar?idNorma=1102225
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico. (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2006/09/starting-strong-ii_g1gh7238/9789264035461-en.pdf
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico. (2021). Starting strong VI: Supporting meaningful interactions in early childhood education and care. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/publications/starting-strong-vi-f47a06ae-en.htm
Pacheco-Salazar, B. (2018). Las voces del estudiantado en la investigación socio-educativa: trascendiendo el adultocentrismo. Ciencia y Educación, 2(2), 43-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.22206/cyed.2018.v2i2.pp43-51
Packer, R., Thomas, A., Jones, C., & Watkins, P. (2020). Voices of transition: sharing experiences from the primary school. Education 3-13, 49(7), 832-844. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1805487
Pardo, M., Opazo, M. J., & Rupin, P. (2021). Escolarización de la educación parvularia en Chile: Consensos entre actores del campo sobre su definición, causas y proposiciones. Calidad en la educación, (54), 143-172. https://doi.org/10.31619/caledu.n54.9531
Pillow, W. (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175-196. http://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635
Rupin, P., Muñoz, C., & Jadue-Roa, D. (2023). So, We Can’t Play: Limitations to Play at School in Periods of Educational Transition in Chile. Education Sciences, 13(3), 317. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030317
Sañudo, M., & Susinos, T. (2018). ¿Quién Toma la Palabra en la Escuela?, ¿Quién Escucha? Preguntas Pertinentes desde la Práctica Reflexiva. Revista latinoamericana de educación inclusiva, 12(1), 79-94. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-73782018000100079
Sevón, E., Mustola, M., Siippainen, A., & Vlasov, J. (2023). Participatory research methods with young children: a systematic literature review. Educational Review, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2215465
Soto, M., & Zapata, B. (2022). Transiciones educativas en la infancia: concepciones de docentes en Chile y Colombia. Revista de estudios y experiencias en educación, 21(46), 12-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.21703/0718-5162.v21.n46.2022.001
Spivak, G. C. (2011). ¿Puede hablar el subalterno? El Cuenco de Plata.
Vasilachis, I. (2007). El aporte de la epistemología del sujeto conocido al estudio cualitativo de las situaciones de pobreza, de la identidad y de las representaciones sociales. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8(3), 1-22.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Crítica.
Yáñez-Urbina, C., Figueroa-Céspedes, I., Soto, J., & Sciolla, B. (2018). La voz en la mirada: fotovoz como una metodología para explorar los procesos de inclusión-exclusión desde la perspectiva del estudiantado. Pensamiento Educativo, Revista de Investigación Latinoamericana (PEL), 55(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.7764/PEL.55.2.2018.4
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ignacio Figueroa-Céspedes, Carla Sepúlveda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors grant an exclusive licence, without time limit, for the manuscript to be published in the Perspectiva Educacional journal, published by the Pontificia Universidad Católica of Valparaíso (Chile), through the School of Pedagogy.