Equality of intelligence and representation-forms. Examples of two cooperative engineerings to social issues
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.63-Iss.3-Art.1590Keywords:
Equality Cooperative engineering forms-representations gender disabilityAbstract
Inequalities of gender and disability are social issues (United Nations for Education, Science and Culture Organization [Unesco], 2016). From an emancipatory perspective, we think that these issues require us to think about equality from a pragmatic point of view, from the moment we put it into practice. In this way, in order for equality to become a reality, it is necessary to develop mechanisms. This article aims to show what favors the achievement of equality in «cooperative engineering ». In particular, we tried to highlight the link between equality, cooperative engineering and « forms-representations », with basis in two empirical examples: cooperative engineering in a primary school, formed by three teachers and a researcher; and cooperative engineering in an ESAT, with the participation of professionals from the ESAT and a researcher.
References
Amonou, I., & Dréan, M. (2018). Questions de sur-vie. Chemin Faisant.
Baxandall, M. (1985). Patterns of intention: On the Historical Explanation of Pictures. Yale University Press.
Baxandall, M. (1991). Les formes de l’intention. Jacqueline Chambon.
Catellin, S.& Loty, L. (2013). Sérendipité et indisciplinarité. Hermès. La Revue, 67 (3), 32-40. https://www.cairn.info/revue-hermes-la-revue-2013-3-page-32.htm
Certeau, M., de (1984). The practice of everyday life (translated by S. Randall). University of California Press.
Collectif Didactique pour Enseigner. (2024). Un art de faire ensemble. Les ingénieries coopératives. Presses universitaires de Rennes.
Gerin, M. (2020). Co-écriture fille-garçon en symétrie. Une ingénierie didactique coopérative pour concrétiser l'égalité des sexes au CP [Doctoral dissertation Rennes 2 University]. https://theses.hal.science/tel-03180995
Joffredo-Le Brun, S., Morellato, M., Sensevy, G., & Quilio, S. (2018). Cooperative engineering as a joint action. European Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117690006
Leutenegger, F. (2000). Construction d’une “clinique” pour le didactique. Une étude des phénomènes temporels de l’enseignement. Recherches en didactique des mathématiques, 20(2), 209-250.
Loisel, P., & Tripp, J.-L. (2009). Loisel et Tripp. Traits complices [film documentaire]. Tripier-Mondano, D., Foch, P., & Le Guellaud, A. (Réalisateurs). Le Lokal Production (Producteur). http://www.lelokalproduction.com/loisel-et-tripp-traits-complices/
Organisation des Nations unies pour l'éducation, la science et la culture. (2016). Déclaration d’Incheon et Cadre d’action pour la mise en œuvre de l'Objectif de développement durable 4 - Assurer à tous une éducation équitable, inclusive et de qualité et des possibilités d’apprentissage tout au long de la vie. Unesco, Éducation 2030. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656_frePerraud, C. (2019). Une ingénierie coopérative en Esat: quand travailler ensemble rend capable de créativité: L’exemple emblématique: une idée farfelue. La nouvelle revue-Éducation et société inclusives, (1), 277-297.https://doi.org/10.3917/nresi.085.0277
Perraud, C. (2022). Travail, handicap et coopération dans un ESAT. Vers un dispositif émancipateur. Presses universitaires de Rennes.
Rancière, J. (1991). The Ignorant Schoolmaster Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation (translated, with an introduction, by Kristin Ross). Stanford University Press.
Rancière, J. (2012). La méthode de l’égalité. Bayard.
Rosa, H. (2010). Alienation and acceleration: Towards a critical theory of Later-modern
Temporality. NSU Press.
Ross, W. (2023). The possibilities of disruption: Serendipity, accidents and impasse driven search. Possibility Studies & Society, 1(4), 489-501. https://doi.org/10.1177/27538699231173625
Sensevy, G. (1999). Eléments pour une anthropologie didactique. [Note for habilitation to direct research, Provence University].
Sensevy, G. (2011). Le sens du savoir. Éléments pour une théorie de l’action conjointe en didactique. De Boeck. https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.sense.2011.01
Sensevy, G. (2020). Joint Action Theory in Didactics (JATD). In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 435-439). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100035
Sensevy, G., & Bloor, T. (2020). Cooperative Didactic Engineering. In S. Lerman (Éd.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 141-145). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100037
Stengers, I. (2011). The plea for slow science. Part 1. [video of a conference] Vrije Universiteit Brussel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BuiQDrViJPw
Stengers, I. (2023). Making sens in common. A Reading of Whitehead in Times of Collapse. University of Minnesota Press.
Wieczorek, M. (2023). Dewey’s Notion of Intelligent Habit as a Basis for Ethical Assessment of Technology. Contemporary Pragmatism, 20(4), 356-377. https://doi.org/10.1163/18758185-bja10074
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Caroline Perraud, Murielle Gerin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors grant an exclusive licence, without time limit, for the manuscript to be published in the Perspectiva Educacional journal, published by the Pontificia Universidad Católica of Valparaíso (Chile), through the School of Pedagogy.
