Peer tutoring as a promoter of teacher professional development: transforming practices and beliefs of teachers in Nicaraguan and Honduran schools.

Authors

  • Carolina Isabel Álvarez Valdés Universidad Finis Terrae
  • Daniel Araneda Quiroz Educación 2020

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.63-Iss.3-Art.1527

Keywords:

Pedagogical practice educational innovation primary school teacher Nicaragua Honduras

Abstract

Teacher Professional Development Programs (TPD) offer an opportunity to improve education, although their results may vary considerably depending on the context and implementation. Nevertheless, they are considered relevant for addressing transformations and meeting new educational demands. In Latin America, countries such as Honduras and Nicaragua have made progress in teacher professionalization; however, important challenges remain. In this context, a pedagogical innovation project was implemented in rural schools in both countries with the objective of improving student learning through the implementation of Peer Tutoring, involving different actors. Specifically, this research focuses on the impact of this innovation in TPD as well as on the characteristics that allow its effectiveness. To address these objectives, a qualitative methodology was used, which included 19 classroom observations, designed to capture in detail the classroom interactions and didactic strategies employed by teachers. In addition, 19 individual interviews with teachers and 16 group interviews with students were conducted. The information was analyzed through thematic content analysis. The findings of the study show a significant change towards constructivist educational paradigms, which is reflected in teachers’ beliefs and practices. This shift highlights the change in the teaching role, which is now seen as a mediator of learning, giving students prominence as builders of their knowledge. The belief that all students can learn if different learning paces are respected is also established. Likewise, the use and formulation of questions becomes central to promoting students’ active and collaborative learning. The importance of socioemotional aspects in learning also emerged, emphasizing the creation of a bond with students to understand their interests, learning styles, and paces, and to foster a climate of trust. Key characteristics of the pedagogical innovation include flexibility and adaptability. These qualities allowed teachers to adjust the strategy to meet the specific needs of their context and their students. The innovation led to rapid and significant transformations in students, who developed greater autonomy, assumed a more active role, and improved their self-esteem and motivation to learn. This aspect is crucial for teachers' adherence to new methodologies. The strategy focused on specific content, active support, and spaces for teacher reflection, which are relevant aspects for effective TPD programs. In conclusion, the educational innovation promoted transformations in the beliefs and practices of the participating teachers, who flexibly adapted the strategy to their contexts as a result of the implementation. This is significant as it demonstrates the professionalization of the role by linking theory and practice to develop adapted strategies. Finally, a question arises about the persistence of these transformations after the project's conclusion.

References

Andréu, J. (2000). Las técnicas de Análisis de Contenido: Una revisión actualizada. Fundación Centro Estudios Andaluces - Universidad de Granada, 10(2), 1-34.

Arciniegas Pradilla, C., & Bento da Silva, J. (2021). Educating for Poverty Relief: The Case of Fe y Alegria. En J. C. Garcia-Huidobro (Ed.), Jesuit Education at the Crossroads: Discussions on Contemporary Jesuit Primary and Secondary Schools in North and Latin America (pp. 259-272). Lexington Books.

Asterhan, C. S. C., & Lefstein, A. (2024). The search for evidence-based features of effective teacher professional development: a critical analysis of the literature. Professional Development in Education, 50(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2283437

Ávalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007

Bolívar, A. (2015, 16 de noviembre). Construir localmente la capacidad de mejora: Liderazgo pedagógico y Comunidad Profesional [Conferencia]. XIII Congreso Nacional de Investigación Educativa (Conferencia Magistral), Chihuahua, Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa (COMIE).

Calderón, M., Silva, M., Villavicencio, M., Larraín, A., Ramos, M., Tapia, H., Sánchez, Á., Moreno, C., & Morán, C. (2020). Trayectorias de desarrollo profesional docente para un uso pedagógico de la argumentación a partir del uso de soportes curriculares digitales. Perfiles educativos, 42(169), 88-105. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2020.169.59245

Cámara, G. (2020). Pedagogía que aprende de su práctica. Redes De Tutoría.

Cámara, G., Castillo, A., De Ávila, Á., Méndez, R., Morales, J. M., & Salas, E. (2018). Tutoría y comunidad de aprendizaje en escuelas públicas multigrado (1997-2018). Siglo XXI.

Carver-Thomas, D., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher turnover: Why it matters and what we can do about it. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/454.278

Centro para la Transformación Educativa. (2019). Informe de evaluación de resultados del proyecto Red 50 Fundación Educación 2020. Centre-UC. URL

Chacón-Víquez, L. (2016). Diagnóstico situacional de la formación de docentes en Honduras. Revista Calidad en la Educación Superior Programa de Autoevaluación Académica, 7(1), 205-232. https://doi.org/10.22458/caes.v7i1.1439

Cirkony, C., Rickinson, M., Walsh, L., Gleeson, J., Salisbury, M., Cutler, B., Berry, M., & Smith, K. (2024). Beyond effective approaches: A rapid review response to designing professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 50(1), 24-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1973075

Correa Molina, E. (2011). La práctica docente: una oportunidad de desarrollo profesional. Perspectiva Educacional, 50(2), 77-95.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

De la Vega, L. (2020). Docencia en aulas multigrado: Claves para la calidad educativa y el desarrollo profesional docente. Revista latinoamericana de educación inclusiva, 14(2), 153-175. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-73782020000200153

Delgado, B. (2020). Formación inicial docente para la enseñanza de la Lectoescritura Inicial en el currículo del título de Maestro en Educación Primaria del Ministerio de Educación Pública de Nicaragua. Revista Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 20(2), 1-15. https://doi.10.15517/aie.v20i2.41600

Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.

Díaz-Quintero, D. (2019). La inserción a la docencia: una política pendiente en el marco de un sistema de formación permanente en Honduras. Conocimiento Educativo, 6, 53-67. https://doi.org/10.5377/ce.v6i0.8041

Duarte, K. (2022). Artesanía Intelectual en el Análisis Cualitativo de Contenido. En K. Duarte (Ed.), Separar para construir. Análisis cualitativo de Información (pp. 11-38). Social Ediciones.

Escudero, J., Cutanda, M. T., & Trillo, F. (2017). Aprendizaje docente y desarrollo profesional del profesorado. Profesorado, Revista de Curriculum y Formación del Profesorado, 21(3), 83-102.

Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE.

Freire, P., & Faúndez, A. (2013). Por una pedagogía de la pregunta: crítica a una educación basada en respuestas a preguntas inexistentes. Siglo XXI.

Lowenthal, P., & Muth, R. (2008). Constructivism. En E. F. Provenzo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the social and cultural foundations of education (pp.177-179). Sage.

Meixi. (2017). Shifting power at school: youth participation in teacher professional learning settings as educational innovation. International Journal of Innovation in Education, 4(2-3), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIIE.2017.088097

Meixi. (2019). The Program for the Improvement of Academic Achievement in México: Tutorial Relationships as an Imposition of Freedom to Transform the Instructional Core. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(3), 394-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2018.1453935

Murphy-Graham, E., & Pacheco Montoya, D. (2021). Reconceptualizando el desarrollo profesional docente en Honduras. Documento Informativo. Universidad Pedagógica Nacional Francisco Morazán. https://upnfm.edu.hn/phocadownload/Noticias/Brief_Honduras_Spanish_Online1.pdf

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2021). Reimagining our Futures Together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.

Paz, C., Barahona, E., & Cárcamo, L. M. (2021). La formación inicial y permanente de docentes para la atención a la primera infancia en Honduras: políticas, modelos y actores. Universidad Nacional de Educación.

Perrenoud, P. (2001). Desarrollar la práctica reflexiva en el oficio de enseñar. Profesionalización y razón pedagógica. Grao.

Popova, A., Evans, D., Breeding, M., & Arancibia, V. (2022). Teacher Professional Development around the World: The Gap between Evidence and Practice. The World Bank Research Observer, 37(1),107-136. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkab006

Reimers, F. (2020) Un estudio sobre cómo los maestros aprenden a educar de forma integral a sus estudiantes y sobre cómo las escuelas apoyan a los maestros a desarrollar las capacidades pedagógicas para hacerlo. En F. Reimers & C. Chung (Eds.) Preparar a los maestros para educar integralmente a los estudiantes. Un estudio comparativo internacional (pp. 7-39). Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación (ICE) de la Universidad de Alicante.

Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. En J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 102-119). Simon & Schuster/Macmillan.

Rincón-Gallardo, S. (2016). Large scale pedagogical transformation as widespread cultural change in Mexican public schools. Journal of Educational Change, 17(4), 411-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9286-4

Schön, D. (1992). La formación de profesionales reflexivos: Hacia un nuevo diseño de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje en las profesiones. Paidós.

Velaz de Medrano, C., & Vaillant, D. (2009). Aprendizaje y desarrollo profesional docente. Santillana.

Villarreal Suárez, J., Muñoz Taborda, J. V., & Perdomo Santacruz, J. M. (2016). Students' Beliefs About Their English Class: Exploring New Voices in a National Discussion, Profile Issues in Teachers` Professional Development, 18(2), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n2.53388

Zacarías, I. (2021). Docencia en construcción: Desafíos en el desarrollo profesional docente en Centroamérica y el Caribe. Informe de Política n°1. GPE-KIX y SUMMA.

Published

2024-12-04

How to Cite

Álvarez Valdés, C. I., & Araneda Quiroz, D. (2024). Peer tutoring as a promoter of teacher professional development: transforming practices and beliefs of teachers in Nicaraguan and Honduran schools. Perspectiva Educacional, 63(3), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.63-Iss.3-Art.1527

Issue

Section

Artículos de Investigación