Español
English
Digital Writing and Labor-based Grading: An Equitable and Inclusive Approach to Undergraduate Writing Instruction
Resumen
The tradition of digital writing instructional practices is nearly 50 years old in the US (Handa, 2004). Sometimes, students fully online digital writing courses may fail to engage with and finish the course because they do not feel competent in handling the technologies in the academic context; thus, it is important to find out what equitable practices and what factors influence student success in these courses. Therefore, this study aims to examine digital writing assignments requested in a writing course, with the goal of demonstrating an inclusive and equitable practice: the Labor-based grading contract, in a way that promotes equal and fair grades. This practice is proposed as a solution to the shortcomings detected, since it has been observed that students inexperienced in pre-college education in the delivery of online writing assignments persist in their difficulties with technological educational platforms in college. The creation of a contract between the teacher and the students -at first-, fosters knowledge, motivation, involvement, or engagement with the task; thus, digital writing assignments go from being an unattainable goal to being a feasible task to engage in. Also, the cooperative creation of this online writing with an easy-to-use platform (Eli Peer Review) stimulates them to persist in the following tasks, as they have already reflected on them and have already found out among their peers what they consist of and how to deal with such tasks.
In our research we present a case study of a course based on online writing instruction. Therefore, this study aims to examine a particular course in the United States in which multimedia writing assignments and labor-based grading allowed for deep student engagement and success (Dickson,1974; Inoue, 2019). The data comes from the use of mixed methods that combine qualitative information collected through document analysis (teacher materials: syllabi, guidelines, instructions; student materials: personal research, blog entries, and final letter); classroom observation field diaries and the semi-structured teacher interview, with the quantitative methods of a student survey. The results show that there is a high degree of alignment between the course and the best practices of online instruction, and that the nature of the assignments and the Labor-based Grading Contract (Dickson,1974, Inoue, 2019) appear to play key roles in student engagement and success in the course. Likewise, the most highlighted aspect by the students has been the emotional factor, since the tasks have allowed them to get involved and enjoy writing in the digital support.
The systematic observation of this writing course aims to deeply understand its provenance, objectives, taxonomy and functionality, with the final purpose of highlighting the capabilities of this methodology in order to offer it as a model in other contexts to promote a fairer and more equitable education.
Texto completo:
¿Cómo citar este artículo?
Mateo-Girona, M., & Dean, C. (2023). Digital Writing and Labor-based Grading: An Equitable and Inclusive Approach to Undergraduate Writing Instruction. Perspectiva Educacional, 62(2). https://dx.doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.62-Iss.2-Art.1404
Citas
Aldaghri, A. A., y Oraif, I. M. (2022). The Impact of Online Teaching on Students’ Engagement in Writing during the Pandemic of COVID-19. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 23 (3), 216-229. DOI: 10.17718/tojde.1137290
Blair, K. L. (2015). Teaching Multimodal Assignments in OWI Contexts. In B.L. Hewett y K. E. DePew, (Eds.), Foundational Practices of Online Writing Instruction (pp.471-491). Parlor Press. DOI: 10.37514/PER-B.2015.0650.2.15
Burgstahler, S. y Cory, R. C. (Eds.). (2008). Universal Design in Higher Education: from Principles to Practice. Harvard Education Press.
Camacho, A., Alves, R.A. y Boscolo, P. (2021). Writing Motivation in School: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research in the Early Twenty-First Century. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 213–247. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-020-09530-4
Carter, M., Ferzli, M., y Wiebe, E. (2004). Teaching Genre to English First-Language Adults: A Study of the Laboratory Report. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(4), 395–419. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171689
Center for First Generation Student Success. (2017, Nov. 20). Defining First-Generation. Center for First Generation Student Success Blog. https://firstgen.naspa.org/blog/defining-first-generation
Collier, R. M. (1983). The Word Processor and Revision Strategies. College Composition and Communication, 34(2), 149-155. DOI: 10.2307/357402
Committee on CCCC Language Statement. (1975). Students’ Right to Their Own Language. College English, 36(6), 709–726. DOI: 10.2307/374965
Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC) Committee for Best Practices in Online Writing Instruction. (2013). A Position Statement of Principles and Example Effective Practices for Online Writing Instruction (OWI). https://ncte.org/statement/owiprinciples/
Day, T. M., Raven, M. R. y Newman, M. E. (1998). The Effects of World Wide Web Instruction and Traditional Instruction and Learning Styles on Achievement and Change in Student Attitudes in A Technical Writing in An Agricommunication Course. Journal of Agricultural Education, 39(4), 65-75. DOI: 10.5032/jae.1998.04065
Dickson, E. G. (1974). Contract Grading. Journal of Financial Education, (3), 21-24.
Ekholm, E., Zumbrunn, S. y DeBusk-Lane, M. (2018). Clarifying an Elusive Construct: A Systematic Review of Writing Attitudes. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 827–856. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-017-9423-5
Gameel, B. G. (2017). Learner Satisfaction with Massive Open Online Courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(2), 98-111. DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2017.1300462
Ghaderizefreh, S., y Hoover, M. L. (2018). Student Satisfaction with Online Learning in a Blended Course. International Journal of Digital Society, 9, 1393-1398. DOI: 10.20533/ijds.2040.2570.2018.0172
González, T., de la Rubia, M. A., Hincz, K. P., Comas-López, M., Subirats, L., Fort, S., Sacha, G. M. (2020). Influence of COVID-19 Confinement on Students’ Performance in Higher Education. PLoS ONE 15(10). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239490
Handa, C. (2004). Visual Rhetoric in a Digital World. A Critical Sourcebook. Ed. Bedford/ St. Martin´s.
Hewett, Beth L., y Kevin Eric DePew (Eds.). (2015). Foundational Practices of Online Writing Instruction. Parlor Press. DOI: 10.37514/PER-B.2015.0650
Inoue, A. B. (2019). Labor-Based Grading Contracts: Building Equity and Inclusion in the Compassionate Writing Classroom. University Press of Colorado. DOI: 10.37514/PER-B.2019.0216.0
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Transforming Learning with Technology: Beyond Modernism and Post-Modernism or Whoever Controls the Technology Creates the Reality. Educational Technology Archive, 40(2), 21-25. DOI: 10.1007/9789462092693_008
Karadag, E. (2021). Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Grade Inflation in Higher Education in Turkey. PLoS ONE 16(8). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256688
Kerr, M., Rynearson, K., y Kerr, M. (2006). Student Characteristics for Online Learning Success. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(2), 91–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.03.002
Krogh, E., y Jakobsen, K.S. (Eds.) (2019). Understanding Young People's Writing Development: Identity, Disciplinarity, and Education. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781351010894
Li, X., Chu, S. K. W., Ki, W. W., y Woo, M. M. (2012). Using a Wiki-based Collaborative Process Writing Pedagogy to Facilitate Collaborative Writing among Chinese Primary School Students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(1), 159-181. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.889
Luri, G. (2019). La escuela no es un parque de atracciones. Una defensa del conocimiento poderoso. Ariel.
MacArthur, C. A. (1988). The Impact of Computers on the Writing Process. Exceptional Children, 54(6), 536-542. DOI: 10.1177/001440298805400607
Mayer, R. E. (2012). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139164603
McGrail, E. y Davis, A. (2011). The Influence of Classroom Blogging on Elementary Student Writing. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25(4), 415-437. DOI: 10.1080/02568543.2011.605205
Mills, S. C. (2006). Using the Internet for Active Teaching and Learning. Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Moore, J. C. (2011). A Synthesis of Sloan-C Effective Practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(1): 91-115.
Moore, J. C. (2009). A synthesis of Sloan-C Effective Practices. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 13(4), 73-94. DOI: 10.24059/olj.v13i4.1649
National Council of Teachers of English (2023). Welcome to the CCCC website.
Navarro, F. (Ed.) (2021). Escritura e inclusión en la universidad. Herramientas para docentes. Universidad de Chile.
Navarro, F., Ávila Reyes, N., y Gómez Vera, G. (2019). Validez y Justicia: hacia una evaluación significativa en pruebas estandarizadas de escritura. Revista Meta: Avaliação, 11(31), 1-35. DOI: 10.22347/2175-2753v11i31.2045
Nepomuceno, M. M. (2011). Writing Online: Using Blogs as an Alternative Writing Activity in Tertiary ESL Classes. TESOL journal, 5(2), 92-105. ISSN 2094-3938
OECD (2017). The OECD Handbook for Innovative Learning Environments. OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264277274-en
Pande, J., y Mythili, G. (2021). Investigating Student Satisfaction with Online Courses: A Case Study of Uttarakhand Open University. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 17(3), 12-28. DOI: 10.4018/IJICTE.20210701.oa2
Perelman, L. (2018). Towards a New NAPLAN: Testing to the Teaching. NSW Teachers Federation.
Pruden, M., Kerkhoff, S. N., Spires, H. A. y Lester, J. (2016). Enhancing Writing Achievement Through a Digital Learning Environment: Case Studies of Three Struggling Adolescent Male Writers. Reading y Writing Quarterly, 33(1), 1-19. DOI: 10.1080/10573569.2015.1059780
Riggs, S. A., y Linder, K. E. (2016). Actively Engaging Students in Asynchronous Online Classes. IDEA Paper# 64. IDEA Center, Inc.
Sturm, J. M., y Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2002). Effects of Hand-Drawn and Computer-Generated Concept Mapping on the Expository Writing of Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research y Practice, 17(2), 124–139. DOI: 10.1111/1540-5826.00039
Writing 2 Committee. (2020). Writing 2/2E/2LK. Curricular guidelines. https://www.writing.ucsb.edu/resources/faculty/curriculum
