Perspectiva Educacional, Vol 61, No 3 (2022)

Tamaño de la letra:  Pequeña  Mediana  Grande

Adecuación de prácticas pedagógicas durante la pandemia y su relación con el compromiso escolar y las necesidades psicológicas de estudiantes secundarios: un estudio cualitativo

Claudia Pérez-Salas, Victoria Parra Moreno, Constanza Belén Monje Carvajal

Resumen


El COVID-19 generó cambios en los ambientes educativos producto del cierre de establecimientos y la instauración de una educación remota de emergencia. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar cómo docentes secundarios adecuaron sus prácticas pedagógicas durante la pandemia para favorecer el compromiso escolar, mediante la satisfacción de las necesidades psicológicas básicas de los estudiantes. Empleando un diseño fenomenológico, se entrevistó a siete docentes de educación secundaria de dos liceos municipales de Chile a través de la plataforma Zoom. Los hallazgos muestran que los docentes adaptaron sus prácticas para satisfacer las necesidades de vinculación, autonomía y competencia de sus estudiantes, utilizando principalmente las estrategias de oportunidad de respuesta, apoyo emocional y la relevancia del contenido. Los docentes refieren cambios en la interacción, las evaluaciones y el uso de plataformas virtuales, que fueron necesarios para fortalecer el compromiso escolar de estudiantes en contextos de educación remota de emergencia.



PDF

Texto completo:

¿Cómo citar este artículo?

Pérez-Salas, C., Parra Moreno, V., & Monje Carvajal, C. (2022). Adecuación de prácticas pedagógicas durante la pandemia y su relación con el compromiso escolar y las necesidades psicológicas de estudiantes secundarios: un estudio cualitativo. Perspectiva Educacional, 61(3). https://dx.doi.org/10.4151/07189729-Vol.61-Iss.3-Art.1315


Citas


Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive learning environments, 1-13.  doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180

Affouneh, S., Salha, S., & Khlaif, Z. N. (2020). Designing quality e-learning environments for emergency remote teaching in coronavirus crisis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 11(2), 135-137. doi:10.30476/ijvlms.2020.86120.1033

Alamri, H., Lowell, V., Watson, W., & Watson, S. L. (2020). Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 322-352. doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449

Apter, B., Arnold, C., & Swinson, J. (2010). A mass observation study of student and teacher behaviour in British primary classrooms. Educational Psychology in Practice, 26, 151-171. doi:10.1080/02667361003768518

Artopoulos, A. (2020). COVID-19: ¿Qué hicieron los países para continuar con la educación a distancia? Revista Latinoamericana de Educación Comparada, 11(17), 1-11. Recuperado desde https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7502927

Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Buntins, K., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology in higher education: A systematic review in the field of arts and humanities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 126-150. doi:10.14742/ajet.5477

Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020). COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education43(4), 466-487. doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184

Chen, B., Bastedo, K., & Howard, W.  (2018). Exploring design elements for online STEM courses:  Active learning, engagement & assessment design. Online Learning, 22(2), 59-75. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i2.1369

Chiu, T. K. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), S14-S30. doi:10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998

Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer.

Claxton, G. (2007). Expanding young people’s capacity to learn. British Journal of Educational Studies. 55(2), 115-134. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00369.x

Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. En M. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 43-77). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago.

Crouse, T., & Rice, M. (2018). Learning to serve students with disabilities online: Teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Online Learning Research, 4(2), 123-145. Recuperado desde https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1184994.pdf

Cummings, C., Mason, D., Shelton, K., & Baur, K. (2017). Active learning strategies for online and blended learning environments. En J. Keengwe & J. Agamba (Eds.), Flipped instruction: Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 88-114). Hershey: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1803-7.ch006

D'Errico, F., Paciello, M., & Cerniglia, L. (2016). When emotions enhance students’ engagement in e-learning processes. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society12(4), 9-23. doi:10.20368/1971-8829 /1144

Estes, J. S. (2016). The pivotal role of faculty in online student engagement and retention. En L. Kyei-Blankson, J. Blankson, E. Ntuli & C. Agyeman (Eds.), Handbook of research on strategic management of interaction, presence, and participation in online courses (pp. 65-87). Hershey: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9582-5.ch003

Fredricks, J. A. (2011). Engagement in school and out-of-school contexts: A multidimensional view of engagement. Theory into practice, 50(4), 327-335. doi:10.1080/00405841.2011.607401

Fredricks, J. (2015). Academic Engagement. En J. Wright (Ed.), The International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 31-36). Orlando: Elsevier.  doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.26085-6

Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059

Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw-Hill.

Herrera, C. D. (2018). Investigación cualitativa y análisis de contenido temático. Orientación intelectual de revista Universum. Revista general de información y documentación, 28(1), 119-142. doi:10.5209/RGID.60813

Jones, E. A., Mitra, A. K., & Bhuiyan, A. R. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on mental health in adolescents: A systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(5), 2470. doi:10.3390/ijerph18052470

Kapasia, N., Paul, P., Roy, A., Saha, J., Zaveri, A., Mallick, R., ... & Chouhan, P. (2020). Impact of lockdown on learning status of undergraduate and postgraduate students during COVID-19 pandemic in West Bengal, India. Children and Youth Services Review, 116, 105194. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105194

Khlaif, Z. N., Salha, S., Affouneh, S., Rashed, H., & ElKimishy, L. A. (2020). The Covid-19 epidemic: teachers’ responses to school closure in developing countries. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 95-109. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2020.1851752

Khlaif, Z. N., Salha, S., & Kouraichi, B. (2021). Emergency remote learning during COVID-19 crisis: Students’ engagement. Education and information technologies, 26, 7033-7055. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10566-4

Lam, S. F., Jimerson, S., Shin, H., Cefai, C., Veiga, F. H., Hatzichristou, C., ... & Basnett, J. (2016). Cultural universality and specificity of student engagement in school: The results of an international study from 12 countries. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 137-153. doi:10.1111/bjep.12079

Lewis, A. D., Huebner, E. S., Malone, P. S., & Valois, R. F. (2011). Life satisfaction and student engagement in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(3), 249-262.  doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9517-6

Lietaert, S., Roorda, D., Laevers, F., Verschueren, K., & De Fraine, B. (2015). The gender gap in student engagement: The role of teachers’ autonomy support, structure, and involvement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 498-518. doi:10.1111/bjep.12095

Malan, M. (2020). Engaging students in a fully online accounting degree: An action research study. Accounting Education, 29(4), 321-339. doi:10.1080/09639284.2020.1787855

Moreira, P., Dias, P., Vaz, F., & Vaz, J. (2013). Predictors of academic performance and school engagement — Integrating persistence, motivation and study skills perspectives using person-centered and variable-centered approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 117-125. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.016

Parsons, J., & Taylor, L. (2011). Improving Student Engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). Recuperado desde https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/745

Rodicio-García, M. L., Ríos-de-Deus, M. P., Mosquera-González, M. J., & Penado, M. (2020). La brecha digital en estudiantes españoles ante la crisis de la covid-19. Revista Internacional De Educación Para La Justicia Social, 9(3), 103-125. doi:10.15366/riejs2020.9.3.006

Sandholtz, J. H. (2011). Preservice teachers’ conceptions of effective and ineffective teaching practices. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38, 27-47. Recuperado desde https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ940632.pdf

Starr-Glass, D. (2016). Participation in online distance learning environments: Proxy, sign, or a means to an end? En L. Kyei-Blankson, J. Blankson, E. Ntuli & C. Agyeman (Eds.), Handbook of research on strategic management of interaction, presence, and participation in online courses (pp. 88-119). Hershey: IGI Global.  doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9582-5.ch004

Strati, A. D., Schmidt, J. A., & Maier, K. S. (2017). Perceived Challenge, Teacher Support, and Teacher Obstruction as Predictors of Student Engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 131-147. doi:10.1037/edu0000108

Trenshaw, K. F., Revelo, R. A., Earl, K., & Herman, G. L. (2016). Using self determination theory principles to promote engineering students’ intrinsic motivation to learn. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32, 1194-1207. Recuperado desde https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/2016_Trenshaw_etal_IJEE.pdf

Tulaskar, R., & Turunen, M. (2021). What students want? Experiences, challenges, and engagement during emergency remote learning amidst COVID-19 crisis. Education and information technologies, 1-37. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10747-1

Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Goossens, L., Dochy, F., Aelterman, N., & Beyers, W. (2012). Identifying configurations of perceived autonomy support and structure: Associations with self- regulated learning, motivation and problem behavior. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 431-439. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.04.002

Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12-23. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002

Wang, M., Fredricks, J., Ye, F., Hofkens, T., & Linn, J. S. (2019). Conceptualization and Assessment of Adolescents’ Engagement and Disengagement in School: A Multidimensional School Engagement Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 592-606. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000431

 

 

 

Wu, W. C. V., Hsieh, J. S. C., & Yang, J. C. (2017). Creating an online learning community in a flipped classroom to enhance EFL learners’ oral proficiency. Journal of Educational Technology & Society20(2), 142-157. Recuperado desde https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305789355_Creating_an_online_learning_community_in_a_flipped_classroom_to_enhance_EFL_learners'_oral_proficiency#fullTextFileContent